Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Global Banks And Insurance Companies Face Troubling Times Ahead

Published 07/17/2012, 04:37 AM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

While Europeans leave the Euro and Euro bonds in droves for the safety and serenity of U.S. Treasuries, forcing the interest rates here in the U.S. on the 10 year to near record lows, currently at 1.45%, many, including myself, talk about the coming Treasury bubble once interest rates reverse course. But it’s not just the U.S. Treasury that is worried about higher rates, it’s the banking and insurance industries too, as higher rates would decimate both industries. This article will explain just what trouble they are going to be facing in the months and years ahead.

What caused me to delve into this analysis now was a recent article that Mish Shedlock wrote where he made the following statement;

Banks are not lending now for three reasons

  1. Banks are capital impaired
  2. Banks are worried about being repaid
  3. The relatively small pool of credit-worthy borrowers who banks would lend to right now, do not want credit
I have written many articles on the issues with the nations top banks, and haven’t written on one other issue these and all other banks have, a similar issue the insurance industry is facing in the near future. First though, let me address one more reason banks aren’t lending which I believe Mish left out.

Reason 4 Why Banks Are Not Lending Now

4. Bank owners don’t want to lock in a low interest rate for 30 years

If you own a bank, would you want to lock in these low rates for 30 years via extending a mortgage? I would think not.

I remember in the mid 80′s my clients bragging about locking in their 5% mortgage rate. A decade or so from now, I imagine getting the same response from those who lock in today’s low rates. This doesn’t mean that real estate is a bargain at today’s prices, but these rates sure make it attractive for many who just want a tax write off and are tired of paying someone else’s mortgage to think about investing in real estate.

Bank Owners Know They Are in Trouble as They Know Higher Rates Are the Future

What would higher interest rates do to the banks that make loans today? Will this increase or decrease those approved for loans?

The answer is an obvious, decrease. Higher rates would kill an already defeated loan industry. How is the loan industry already defeated? They just lost 21% of their ability to loan because Wells Fargo, who just settled a discrimination lawsuit for $175 million, has ceased doing loans. If those who were allegedly discriminated against before couldn’t get a loan, try and get one now.

At present, loan applications for FHA fell by 20.7% over last month and refi applications fell 44%. If no one is borrowing at today’s low rates, will a zero rate induce purchases? Will banks loan? If you owned a bank, would you? Seriously, where is the profit to be gained?

Is it any wonder that the nations top banks and other financial companies are playing the derivatives market to try and make a buck? From the looks of it, they suck at it too. Just look at the multi-billion loss (over $5 billion) by J.P. Morgan recently as well as the bankruptcy of MF Global. They made bad bets and lost. Who’s next?

The Fed has to keep rates low as long as possible, and bank owners and managers are doing all they can to try and pay the bills and eek out a profit. If that means taking on more risk, then of course they will do that because they know Uncle Sam will be there to bail them out at taxpayer expense….”to save the system.” See TARP.

Which brings us to an industry that has flown under the radar of most….until now.

The Insurance Industry Problems Coming To Surface

Many may not realize this, but for years insurance companies have guaranteed 3%, 4% or more on their annuity and life insurance contracts. Annuities are the type of product that pay a stated amount of interest for a specified period of time, but have a guarantee built into them that states the interest rate wont’ fall below a certain percentage. While there are various types of annuities, the majority of them sold before the hybrid or variable annuities surfaced, were what were called “fixed” annuities. The same goes for the stated rate of interest guaranteed in life insurance contracts called Universal Life.

The problem for these types of products is interest rates have fallen below the guaranteed rates.

How Does An Insurance Company Investment Manager Invest Their Assets?

Insurance companies that sell annuities and life insurance are long term oriented in nature. They plan for decades ahead to make sure they have the funds available to meet the mortality of their clients in the future. In other words, they are counted on to be there when the money is needed.

But insurance companies have to have good investment management to plan ahead for these future claims on their assets. In the meantime, they have to pay their salesmen, employees and try to eek out a profit for their stock holders if a stock company, or dividend if they are a mutual company. So the overall rate of return on investments is something that a policy holder of that company would want to analyze.

I know for decades, the insurance companies guaranteed 3% (or more) on their life insurance and annuity products. Some of these insurance companies invested in longer term bonds years ago that have allowed them to keep paying the higher rates to their clients through today. But how are these insurance companies investing today? Are their portfolio managers locking in these low 5 and 10 year rates? Longer? What about those companies that didn’t lock in the higher rates years ago, but promised their clients 3% or more?

“If” we did have a continuance of this low interest rate environment, how can many of these companies survive?….especially when the majority are limited in scope of investment as most insurance companies are investing in bonds…(they usually invest very little in stocks, most under a 5% allocation).

Let’s take a look at some of the nations top insurance companies and see what trends are developing. The following chart shows the ratings of various companies using two of the following ratings companies, A.M. Best and Weiss.

A.M. Best is the most recognized ratings company for insurers and they provide a financial and operating performance rating. Weiss Ratings is known as a stickler that many in the insurance field don’t like because of their perceived bias. Weiss and other ratings agencies are explained below;

  • Standard & Poor’s provides financial strength ratings for those insurers who request a rating. S&P also provides financial strength ratings from public information for other insurers.
  • Moody’s and Fitch provide ratings for those insurers who request a rating. Therefore, ratings from these two services are not available for all insurance companies.
  • Weiss Ratings provides safety ratings on more than 1,700 insurance companies.
  • The Comdex Ranking
The chart analyzes what percentage of assets each of these insurers have invested in bonds and stocks, what the yield has been on assets for the last 5 and 1 years, as well as the return on investments.

Ins Co Analysis
As you can see by the above chart, the current investment yield is lower than the 5 year average for all but one of these companies (Allianz who has had a higher percentage in bonds than the other companies). With the investment yield falling and return on equity even turning negative in two cases above, insurance companies in general will be struggling to just make ends meet in the months and years to come. Once interest rates do move higher, and depending on the length of time each of these companies has invested their bond portfolio will dictate possible future issues. Did they lock in today’s 1.45% 10 year Treasury, guaranteeing them a rather lousy return compared to historic returns moving forward? Are they buying more short term bond maturities so they don’t get stuck with the lower rates when interest rates turn higher? Or are they taking on more risk in other areas to make up for these interest rate declines. What if interest rates stay lower ala Japan for 10 more years? (I am not in this latter camp, but many thought Japan, the world leader in Debt to GDP ratio, wouldn’t be able to handle this increase in debt).

This chart might answer some of those questions as it shows the average maturity of the bond portfolios of these companies.
Ins Co Bond Maturity 1

What this chart tells me is that for the next 10 years on average, these particular insurance companies (and most others that invest accordingly) will be struggling to find investment yield whether interest rates stay the same or move higher. If they stay the same, the higher guarantees they promised of 3% or more will eat away at their bottom line. If they move higher, then 60% of their portfolio or more will be affected negatively (interest rates move up, bond values move down).

Where is your insurance company invested? Chances are, you don’t know. You just trust the insurance agent or broker who tells you the magic buzz words of “guaranteed” and “lifetime income.”

In fact, your annuity or life insurance cash value are guaranteed only to a certain maximum through a state insurance guarantee fund. This amount will vary from $100,000 to $500,000 depending on your state.

Insurance Companies Pushing Immediate Annuities

Insurance companies are doing all they can now in getting people with money to lock in a Guaranteed Immediate Annuity with the promise of a lifetime income. Guaranteed immediate annuities are an investment vehicle that will guarantee a lifetime income for you or you and your spouse, paying you a small bit of interest and a return of your principal, making it look like you are getting a good return on your contribution. They tell you that you’ll never run out of money as long as you live. Well, that is true, as long as the insurance company you get the immediate annuity from is still in business.

But these products will turn out to be the worst investment a person can make once we see interest rates move higher. A money market will give you a better return than these products will once interest rates turn higher, AND you get to keep your principal and leave it to your loved ones.

The Bottom Line

When interest rates do finally rise, banks will find it more difficult to loan and insurance company portfolios will be negatively effected.

Whether you are a bank owner or run an insurance company (or manage the investments for one), the future as well as the present is troublesome.

It’s not just the Fed and the U.S. Treasury who are worried about a bubble bursting with the rise in interest rates. Banks and Insurance Companies are facing the same type of problems. This presents an even stronger case in pointing out that most every investor in the U.S. has good reason to buy the only “real” safe haven that will be left standing; gold and silver. What percentage of your portfolio is invested in gold and silver bullion? Doesn’t it make sense for you to diversify?

You buy insurance for your home, auto, life, and health, but of these four things, how many do you actually collect on? Your portfolio, especially at this point in our nations history where the entire globe is financially interconnected by the Central Banking System, needs the insurance that physical gold and silver provide. All Central Banks own gold as insurance against their own currency problems. They always have. It’s about time you do to.

Latest comments

Very interesting article, i believe it's time for Euro to disappear, E.U. will never work.
I would challenge two of the original assumptions. Point #1 is that banks are capital impaired. However, the banking industry as a whole is better capitalized now than at any time in the last four years and maybe longer. In fact, core capital (leverage ratio) and tier 1 risk-based capital ratios show that both ratios are at all time highs. The leverage ratio averaged 7.15% from 1984 to 2006. During the financial crises, the ratio went from 8.24% in Q1 2007 to a low of 7.47% in Q4 2008 and has rebounded to 9.20% in Q1 2012 – the highest it has been 28 years. Similarly, the tier 1 risk-based capital ratio averaged 10.10% from 1990 to 2006 and then went from 10.50% in Q1 2007 to a low of 9.79% in Q3 2008 and has since rebounded to 13.28% in Q1 2012 – the highest on record for the last 22 years. Point #4 is that banks don't want a rise in long-term interest rates. While it is true that long-term fixed rates such as 30-year mortgages could be a detriment to the lender, banks actually benefit from a rising interest-rate environment due to an increase in net interest margin. In this environment, banks typically have locked in deposits or cost of funds at very low rates while being able to charge higher rates on loans for the short to midterm in arising interest rate environment. Higher margins lead to increased profits. However, this depends on how well the bank has managed it interest risk portfolio.
I would challenge two of the original assumptions regarding banks: Point #1 is that banks are capital impaired. The banking industry is actually better capitalized now than at any time in the prior four years and possibly longer. In fact, core capital and risk-based capital ratios are at all time highs on an aggregated basis. For example, the leverage ratio averaged 7.15% from 1984 to 2006 and since the financial crises in 2007 the ratio has gone from 8.24% in Q1 2007 to a low of 7.47% in Q4 2008 and has rebounded to 9.20% in Q1 2012 – the highest it has been 28 years. Similarly, the tier 1 risk-based capital ratio averaged 10.10% from 1990 to 2006, went from 10.50% in Q1 2007 to a low of 9.79% in Q3 2008 and has since rebounded to 13.28% in Q1 2012 – the highest on record for the last 22 years. There will always be some number of under-capitalized banks, but as a whole the industry is very well capitalized. Point #4 stated that banks don't want to lock in long-term interest rates. While it is true that long-term fixed rates such as 30-year mortgages could be a detriment to the lender, banks actually benefit from a rising interest rate environment due to an increase in net interest spreads. In this environment, banks typically have locked in deposits or cost of funds at very low rates while being able to charge higher rates on loans for the short to mid-term in a rising interest rate environment. Higher margins lead to increased profits. However, this depends on how well the bank has managed its interest-risk portfolio. One could argue that higher rates would lead to a lower volume of loans because borrowers would shun the higher rates but rates would not theoretically rise until there is evidence of a stronger economy and the Fed stops artificially lowering interest rates. Once employment picks up and rates normalize to more historical averages, banks will still maintain a healthy sized loan portfolio.
Hi Gene, I appreciate the comment. I am speaking primarily of the nations top 5 banks who have more sub-investment grade derivatives than at the height of the 2008/2009 financial crisis. Dodd/Frank did nothing to curtail this and it is never mentioned in the mainstream media. Where you and I differ on the rest is of course the "when" on the economy rebounding. I see nothing in my crystal ball that will all of a sudden spark the economy and cause things to improve because of some magic business plan working for the majority of companies traded. We have a long, drawn out recession ahead of us, lower stock prices (read Ed Easterling's work) and Bernanke (is) could turn it into something worse with his meddling. Higher rates can come via the market action just like in Europe with Spain, Greece and Italy and more countries to come. Japan is on the brink leading the world in Debt to GDP with an aging population. The Fed is tied to Europe already and it is indeed the banking system, despite its higher capitalization as you mention, that is based on a flawed fractional reserve framework, and is literally a house of cards that a few more wrong derivative bets will bring down.
Hi Gene, (difficult to post, so trying again) sorry for any repeats... I appreciate the comment. I am speaking primarily of the nations top 5 banks who have more sub-investment grade derivatives than at the height of the 2008/2009 financial crisis. Dodd/Frank did nothing to curtail this and it is never mentioned in the mainstream media. Where you and I differ on the rest is of course the "when" on the economy rebounding. I see nothing in my crystal ball that will all of a sudden spark the economy and cause things to improve because of some magic business plan working for the majority of companies traded. We have a long, drawn out recession ahead of us, lower stock prices (read Ed Easterling's work) and Bernanke (is) could turn it into something worse with his meddling. Higher rates can come via the market action just like in Europe with Spain, Greece and Italy and more countries to come. Japan is on the brink leading the world in Debt to GDP with an aging population. The Fed is tied to Europe already and it is indeed the banking system, despite its higher capitalization as you mention, that is based on a flawed fractional reserve framework, and is literally a house of cards that a few more wrong derivative bets will bring down.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.