- When VIX Futures are below 15, no VIX calls are purchased
- When VIX futures are between 15 and 30, 1% of the portfolio goes into VIX calls
- When VIX futures are between 30 and 50, 0.5% of the portfolio goes into VIX calls
- When VIX futures are above 50, no VIX calls are purchased
According to a white paper (PDF) on the index on CBOE’s site, “In October 2008, VXTH (the symbol for the index in question) earned 1.48% while the S&P 500 lost 21.36%. This is the month when the tail hedge went to work. The trade-off was a cut in the rate of return in most non-crisis months. The average rate of the S&P 500 in these months was 0.7% and that of VXTH was 0.59%.” In other words, investors subscribing to this fund’s tactics will be paying a premium for a potentially very lucrative insurance policy should markets go south in a hurry. However, if markets remain stable or just slowly trend downwards, the calls seem unlikely to pay off and could result in underperformance. Given this, investors need to weigh the value of this insurance policy with the higher fees and the potential for lower returns in non-crisis periods in order to decide if this tactic is for them [Volatility ETFs: The Real Safe Haven?].
Competition
Very few products look to use this type of dynamic hedging as most of the funds in the Large Cap Blend Equities ETFdb Category implement ’plain vanilla’ tactics that focus on replications of an index. While some recent additions to the space look to segment the large cap space more thoroughly, a few look to provide dynamic approaches as well. Two of the most well-known are likely to be TRND and SPGH, both of which combine investments in gold with broad equity allocations, although, it should be noted, they do this in very different ways [Compare SPGH to TRND here]. Beyond these products, BARL, which allocates half of its exposure to crude oil and half to the S&P 500, also offers some degree of diversification above the regular index as well [When ETNs Are Better Than ETFs].Although all of these are likely to pose some challenge to a possible fund from First Trust in the space, the main competition looks to be from Barclays and that company’s ETN+ S&P VEQTOR ETN (VQT). This fund tracks the S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Total Return Index which seeks to provide investors with broad equity market exposure with an implied volatility hedge by dynamically allocating its notional investments among three components: equity, volatility and cash. The fund cycles between the three depending on levels of volatility with more of the fund going towards volatility during high periods of uncertainty and more towards equities when volatility is at low levels [see more on VQT's Fact Sheet]. The product has a little over $90 million in assets and trades about 30,000 shares a day so while it has a decent sized lead, it is by no means insurmountable, suggesting that if this proposed fund from First Trust can get by the regulatory hurdles, it could see decent inflows from investors seeking more protection in the space.
Disclosure: No positions at time of writing, photo is courtesy of Payton Chung. ETF Database is not an investment advisor, and any content published by ETF Database does not constitute individual investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. From time to time, issuers of exchange-traded products mentioned herein may place paid advertisements with ETF Database. All content on ETF Database is produced independently of any advertising relationships.

